Pamela Anderson would like for Republican Vice-Presidential candidate Sarah Palin to “suck it“:
[Pamela] Anderson, 41, was recently in Toronto speaking out against the abuse of animals in Hollywood.
When asked by E! News Weekend Canada about Palin, she has some choice words for the Republican hopeful.
The reporter asked Pam if she saw a recent Newsweek article, which showed a gigantic bear hide in the office of Palin’s house.
“I can’t stand her,” Pam blurted out. “She can suck it!”
That Pamela Anderson sure doesn’t like Sarah Palin if she’s going to tell her to suck it like that. This puts a new spin on Obama’s recent quote of, “These people.” It’s entirely possible that he meant, “These people…can suck it!”
Half Empty Guy,
Funny. Bo Derek is a Republican, but in five years of blogging I’ve never cited her as a relevant critic of Democratic politics.
Maybe I just don’t appreciate the esthetic thrill you enlightened ones get from puppeteering a slut you despise into parroting your tolerance-based politics to the masses.
Your site used to be better than this. Occasionally you evinced some thought. Now I have to type “butt hash” to be allowed to comment.
If you’ve become such a lion of lefty superiority make the trip over to Instapunk and use your massive intellect to rebut this:
http://www.instapunk.com/archives/InstaPunkArchiveV2.php3?a=1494
I won’t hold my breath. I think you’re perfectly content to slide silently into the nirvana of Dulzheimer’s.
More’s the pity. What would tempt you out? A size Double GG pair of Progressive Tits? Forget it. best case, the cups are half empty — and petrified as a left wing brain.
Hold on there, partner!
As the author of the post, I meant absolutely nothing complimentary there regarding Pam Anderson or her words. I didn’t bother to comment on it in any substantive fashion because it was self-evidently stupid; rather like a 2-year-old saying “POOPY!”
The Waterglass is a group blog (not unlike your own, though few of us have had the time and/or ability to craft posts with your level of analysis), don’t forget. Typically, my own posts of late have simply been to amuse myself and/or my fellow bloggers Josh and Morgan. Or to make jokes at their expense.
In fact, I read the post you linked to an hour or so ago and was thinking of linking it, as I found it to be insightful, the way most of your posts tend to be. I’m not going to try to rebut it, because I agree with it, for the most part.
Anyhow, there’s no lefty superiority here.
What would tempt me out to write more would be less responsibility at work and more time to comment.
As for the “butthash” security word, I’ll admit that I added that to the list months ago, giggling. It’s part of the low-class sense of humor I share with my fellow bloggers here.
Do you want me to tell everyone what I had to type this time? Forget it.
Okay. I admit I lose track of what is snarky and what is cheeky. I apologize. But rather than think about linking me you might actually do it when I have a unique post. So I’ll put in the link you couldn;t quite bring yourself to. It’s a very significant one:
http://www.instapunk.com/archives/InstaPunkArchiveV2.php3?a=1494
If you or your readers agree, please consider forwarding it to everyone you can think of. I think you know Instapunk doesn’t do this kind of thing. Ordinarily we’re happy just being right when everyone else is wrong. This is different. So forgive the intrusion and the seeming self-importance. This time, we’re committed.
Thank you for your manners and forebearance.
Thank goodness for Pam Anderson.
SUCK IT.
It’s about time a celebrity said what needed to be said about what was needed to be said. I’m tired of all these celebrities keeping their traps shut. We need them on the campaign trail.
SUCK IT.
Sing it, sister.
Wow, that was weird. Me thinks I’ll stay away from that instapunk thing. He sounds kind of creepy… Butt Hash FTW!!
I know I said I wasn’t going to read it…but that link no worky…
The link works fine.
Suck it.
Suck IT!