Comments on: Jenkem Story Still Being Peddled as Fact

By: Butt Hash Advocate

Butt Hash Advocate — Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:39:02 +0000

Jenkem is for real. And I love it.

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/jenkem/

By: von

von — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:01:26 +0000

another shitty post.

By: Joshua

Joshua — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:11:00 +0000

I’d call them, “America’s Overly-Bored Youth.”

By: David

David — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 01:06:08 +0000

I’d call them “butthashers”.

By: Morgan

Morgan — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:26:40 +0000

“Sir, put the poop down on the ground and step away from the poop.”

What would you call someone that uses this stuff? Poopheads? Poopies? Shitites?

By: Chip Mango

Chip Mango — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:57:14 +0000

I have often wondered that meself. How could shite be illegal? Can blokes be arrested for possession of poop? If the poop is in ziploc bags, will they be charged with intent to distribute? Is it like laws against making moonshine and other versions of “hooch”-like alcohol? As soon as a dump ferments, it’s a controlled substance?

Blimey! This is a real legall pickle!

By: David

David — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:48:42 +0000

Will poop become a controlled substance? Are there laws against poop huffing? Why indeed are drug investigators talking about arresting people?

By: Kurt

Kurt — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:13:35 +0000

What is also amazing is the “drug investigators” and their comments. First, they talk of arresting people for something that is not yet a crime. Then, they automatically think that kids will do absolutely anything and without their protection will fall into complete barbarism. Finally, the idea that simply because it creates euphoria it is evil – why?

These people have swollen heads (ok – that is my new idea, use the anti-spam work in every post)

By: Joshua

Joshua — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:46:29 +0000

I had no idea “slimy” could be a color adjective. I suppose if “bright” can be an adjective, why not slimy?

I wonder if America’s media and culture will be better after the writer’s strike: considering the crap they churn out year after year, the less of it, the better. If reporters went on strike, would that change how the media reports? Probably not. We can expect more jenkem stories from here on out.

By: David

David — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:08:41 +0000

Serious?

There’s nothing funny about jenkem. Nothing.

Joking aside, I really am even more disillusioned about the journalism trade, and my opinion of it was never terribly high to begin with. This shows in true colors of bright yellow and slimy brown how sensation-driven journalism is. I’m surprised that they haven’t gone on strike along with the Hollywood writers.

By: Joshua

Joshua — Sun, 11 Nov 2007 18:58:42 +0000

You are currently browsing the archives for the Butthash category.

By: Joshua

Joshua — Sun, 11 Nov 2007 18:57:55 +0000

This story grows like a weed through the American media. I think part of this is the sensationalism associated with the story… wild Africa comes to U.S. middle class teens, the Fear Factor aspect of using bodily waste to get high. Whatta story! Run it on Page One! The media loves sensational stories. Amazing, to, that the media are treating jokes from a website as serious “nicknames” for the drug. “Butthash” was invented by someone who never would even think of using jenkem or would know anyone who did.

News agencies and reporters who spread this story as truth deserve all the ridicule they will receive.

I am glad that The Waterglass is so serious about the butthash/jenkem story that it is now an official category.